Coming Soon: Snakes on a Plane


This is what I had to say (in the KJToo forums) about Snakes on a Plane back on 03 October 2005:

There are apparently snakes. On a plane.

That’s the actual title of the movie, by the way. Snakes on a Plane. Why is Samuel L. Jackson in this movie? Does he owe someone a favor and/or vast amounts of money? Maybe he lost a bet.

The director, David R. Ellis, has mostly done stunt work. That doesn’t bode well. He was also a second unit director on Harry Potter and the Sorceror’s Stone and The Matrix Reloaded, so maybe… wait, The Matrix Reloaded? Gah. Forget I said anything.

Still, Snakes on a Plane has a certain traffic accident appeal to it. Or maybe it’s more like the sensation you get when you’re looking over the edge of Niagara Falls. You know, there’s part of you that just wants to jump into the raging water, even though you know beyond the shadow of a doubt that to do so would be Bad with a capital B.

Four days later, I read an interview on with Samuel L. Jackson and this quote caught my eye:

Samuel L. Jackson: You either want to see that, or you don’t.

Mr. Jackson’s attitude about the movie was enough to make me reconsider my initial trepidation. When you’re talking about a movie called Snakes on a Plane, there really shouldn’t be any question in your mind about what you can expect to see. Consider On Golden Pond. There’s a title that reveals little — if anything — about the content of the movie. How would you, as a potential viewer, know if On Golden Pond would be of interest to you? Well, you’d have to watch a trailer, or maybe read a summary of the plot. Snakes on a Plane has a summary of the plot built right into the title, and “you either want to see that, or you don’t.”

As someone who has watched nearly every snake movie aired on the SciFi Channel in the past three years, I would definitely fall into the “want to see that” demographic; but watching King Cobra for free on the SciFi Channel and shelling out eight bucks to see it in the theater are two very different things. There’s no way I’m plunking down eight of my hard earned dollars for the privilege of watching the monster-of-the-week movie on SciFi.

That’s where Samuel L. Jackson comes in. His mere presence is enough to elevate Snakes on a Plane from “I’ll watch it Saturday night on SciFi” to “I’ll pay to see it in a theater.” Maybe not for you, but certainly for me; maybe not for every movie, but certainly for Snakes on a Plane.

Plus, Snakes on a Plane is something of a phenomenon; a movie that generated an almost instant cult following before a single frame made its way to the Internet. The buzz created last fall was enough to make the New Line keep the original name (they had considered changing the title to Pacific Air 121) and even shoot some additional scenes to—get this—increase the gore and profanity in order to bump the MPAA rating from PG-13 to R.

Samuel L. Jackson is on a plane with snakes. You needn’t be Nostradamus to predict that the presence of snakes on the plane will not make Samuel L. Jackson happy. Is it worth $8.25 (plus $1 Fandango processing fee) to see just how Mr. Jackson deals with the snakes? I’ll let you know Friday morning.

4 responses to “Coming Soon: Snakes on a Plane”

  1. Greg Avatar

    Best. Movie. EVER.

  2. KJToo Avatar

    [Comment ID #3172 Will Be Quoted Here]

    Internet hype!

  3. Elder, Bigger, Lil Sis Avatar
    Elder, Bigger, Lil Sis

    I can pretty much guarantee that I will most definately not be going to see Snakes on a Plane. Anyone with questions as to why can ask Lil Sis and Cousin Phil what they used to do with the snakes from the bottom of the hay wagons…

  4. Greg Avatar

    Heh heh. Of course it’s internet hype. I don’t actually expect the movie to be that good. I’ll be almost disappointed if the movie isn’t laughably cheezy. My fondest hope is that it doesn’t take itself seriously, and that it is easily made fun of.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *