Comments on: Welcome to Parenthood: Nine Months

By: Thagg

Thagg — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:06:47 +0000

Wow. Who let all the nerds in here?

All were invited.

Besides, you attract what you are.

By: Elder, Bigger, Lil' Sis

Elder, Bigger, Lil' Sis — Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:50:57 +0000

Well! Auntie BeeJa just has to say that it is about *damn* time that you posted a recent picture of the young apprentice. You know, some of us don’t get to see the mostest cutest (that’s right that’s exactly what I meant to say) on a regular basis!

Btw, does Friday the 13th happen every nine months???

By: P.G. Holyfield

P.G. Holyfield — Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:33:35 +0000

Independent of this post KJ and I discovered the other day that our babies were born 3 days apart. Considering the pain Alexis put her mother through (almost 9 pounds at birth), I’d be killed for even joking about this plan.

By: KJToo

KJToo — Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:25:38 +0000

Wow. Who let all the nerds in here?

By: Thagg

Thagg — Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:43:02 +0000

From what I understand, though, maintenance and support issues become an increasing burden as the number of simultaneous instances grows.

Through version 4.0 the maintenance costs and time involvment do increase, as you stated, on a non-linear curve. According to my sources, after that it becomes more a question of berth space.

By: KJwon

KJwon — Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:54:12 +0000

I sure hope you got a virus blocker…

By: blob

blob — Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:57:16 +0000

Totally besides the point.
With this system you keep 1.0 even after the release of 2.0.
It is not a replacement, it is not an upgrade. It is synergistic.

From what I understand, though, maintenance and support issues become an increasing burden as the number of simultaneous instances grows. Not in a linear fashion, thankfully, but still something to consider.

By: Thagg

Thagg — Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:34:37 +0000

We’ve found no compatibility or security issues with 1.0, nor does he appear to be lacking any of our required or desired features. We have no immediate plans for a new release

Totally besides the point.

With this system you keep 1.0 even after the release of 2.0.

It is not a replacement, it is not an upgrade. It is synergistic.

By: Dana. a.k.a.: Marguerite

Dana. a.k.a.: Marguerite — Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:17:33 +0000

Awe, congrats :-). Wait until your young apprentice hits his terrible twos and thinks he knows better than you. Come to think of it, my five year old apprentice still thinks he knows better than me, but he’s learning ;-).

By: KJToo

KJToo — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:39:58 +0000

Chris Miller on Wednesday, 25 October 2006 at 3:22 pm said:

Excellent. So when will we see 2.0?

*ducks*

We’ve found no compatibility or security issues with 1.0, nor does he appear to be lacking any of our required or desired features. We have no immediate plans for a new release.